Posts Tagged ‘immigration’

According to Politico Sean Hannity stated on his radio program that he has ‘evolved’ on immigration and now supports a ‘pathway to citizenship’ for undocumented immigrants in this country.

From Politico:

“It’s simple to me to fix it,” Hannity said. “I think you control the border first. You create a pathway for those people that are here — you don’t say you’ve got to go home. And that is a position that I’ve evolved on. Because, you know what, it’s got to be resolved. The majority of people here, if some people have criminal records you can send them home, but if people are here, law-abiding, participating for years, their kids are born here, you know, first secure the border, pathway to citizenship, done.”

“You can’t let the problem continue — it’s got to stop,” the conservative radio host added.


My position on the immigration issue has also evolved.  I agree with Hannity.  Our nation needs to provide a pathway to citizenship for those undocumented immigrants living here in the U.S.

With saying that….

In the 80′s President Reagan brokered a deal with the Democrat controlled congress to grant amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants in exchange for the Democrats making sure that the border would be secured or closed.  Reagan kept his end of the bargain.  However, Democrats in congress failed to keep their end of the deal and they broke their promise to close the border.  Democrats breaking promises? No big surprise here.

Compromise is needed from both Democrats and Republicans on the immigration issue.  If the border is secured, or in the process there of and funding for the border project continues as necessary, then I am okay with supporting a pathway to citizenship for the undocumented immigrants in the United States.

Read Full Post »

As American citizens we consider the United States to be our home.  Instead of the USCCB calling for the enforcement of our current immigration laws and being for the nation to have a right (moral duty?) to close its borders in order to protect its sovereignty the bishops are swerving to the Left and advocating that immigrants violate the laws of the land so these immigrants are able to better themselves economically.

Should we open the floodgates and allow Cubans, Christians being persecuted in Africa and the Middle East, and those being coerced to comply with China’s One-Child Policy to enter the United States without using the proper due process for immigrating to the U.S.?  What gives those persons crossing the border a right to break our laws while others in faraway lands don’t have that right?

The two reasons immigrants from Central America Mexico have been able to cross the border illegally is 1) because of their proximity in location to the United States and 2) our politicians/government refuses to do what is necessary to enforce current laws on the books and secure our borders. Those immigrants who have chosen to risk their lives in order to invade America so that they may be able to improve their life conditions are ignoring the laws of the United States and taking advantage of a huge gap in our enforcement of border laws.  The problem is that the USCCB ignores putting the onus of the responsibility on the individuals/families who have defied a sovereign nation’s laws as well as the burden of responsibility on their countries of origin.

The bishops seemed to have forgotten our economic woes – 8.3% unemployment – and many more who are either underemployed, have stopped looking, or those who are still looking for work but are considered out of the workforce because of the extended length of time that they have been searching for employment.

The problem with the USCCB advocating for lawlessness for immigrant law-breakers is that the bishops are disenfranchising law-abiding citizens in the U.S.


From Economic Instability and the Migrant Family: Given the economic inequalities that separate the developed from the developing worlds and the important role that these differences play in migration patterns, the Catholic bishops have repeatedly stressed that an open-door immigration policy is not a solution to the problem of illegal immigration. Repeatedly?!? When? Where? I have rarely, if ever, heard them denounce the open-door policy.  

International economic development is a crucial component in the management of migration patterns, illegal or otherwise. The bishops of the United States, in their pastoral letter Strangers No Longer, called on the United States to work in solidarity with the international community to help raise the standard of living, uphold human rights, and implement complementary political institutions in the underdeveloped world so that people can have the chance to prosper in their homelands, rather than having to migrate to find opportunities elsewhere.   When has the USCCB advocated for this, recently? All I ever hear is about is that it is the moral duty of the United States to accept these illegal immigrants with open-arms no questions asked.  I am all for helping those who are less fortunate but individuals need to take responsibility for their own actions.  Shouldn’t immigrants bear some responsibility for their actions?  Okay maybe once I’ve heard the USCCB talk about the responsibility of the immigrants homelands.  This is something that needs to be said more often, and yes, publicly.  

The lack of economic opportunities confronting large segments of Latin America and the Caribbean places significant strain on families, often presenting them with a troubling choice. Some choose to stay together and remain in their home country, even amidst difficult conditions in which economic stresses wear on familial attachments and communal stability. Others choose to leave their family and head northward, with the hope of making it to the United States, finding worthwhile employment, and sending money home. The lure of a better life in the United States and in other developed countries promises opportunities, but it also carries its own dangers.  The bishops complain about family members being separated from one another but then justify that separation when immigrants go to a different nation looking for economic opportunities.  Don’t they realize that choices have consequences?  That these immigrants make the choice to be separated from their families?  In addition, that there are consequences for entering a country illegally?  

If economic instability is a justification for breaking the law is it okay for Americans who are struggling with economic instability to break the law to better their life situations?  If not, why is it justified for the immigrant and not the citizen?

From USCCB Blog:

When a country is saddled with immigration policies {Lack of border security} that have resulted in 12 million people living under the radar {The USCCB fails to recognize the main reason for this is people chose to enter the country illegally}, it’s reasonable to say, “Everyone recognizes the system is broken; let’s move forward and replace this broken system with something that works so that everyone can benefit.” Hence the bishops’ calls for comprehensive immigration reform. {The problem with advocating for comprehensive immigration reform is the last time this happened and a deal was made under Reagan to secure the border while at the same time granting amnesty to immigrants the Democrats broke the agreement and this is the reason why we have more illegal immigrants in the country today} Conversely, the approach of digging in further with the same enforcement-only approach that has been used for the last two decades is an example of repeating the same practice and expecting different results. It’s also reasonable to recognize that one simply cannot deport 12 million people, with the costs, economic disruptions and logistical difficulties making it beyond impractical. {I agree with the bishops on this.  But I do believe some penalty should be applied to the immigrants who used the back door to enter America instead of the front door}

It’s reasonable to question practices like raiding workplaces, separating families and holding people in prolonged detention as a proportionate response to non-violent offenders whose only offenses were motivated by need and, to be blunt about it, family values. It’s reasonable to recognize that a tension can exist between two important values–in this case, the right of a country to secure and guard its borders and the right of people to emigrate to seek a livelihood for themselves and their families–and realize that a creative accommodation can alleviate that tension, whether that means increasing the number of visas given annually to meet demand or removing roadblocks to naturalization for young people who had no choice in coming. { I agree that the number of visas issued to immigrants needs to be increased.  I am not sure whether the children of those who immigrated here illegally should become naturalized citizens automatically but I do think that they should be granted some type of legal status as long as they don’t have a criminal record} 

Despite all of these enforcement‐driven efforts,{which are outlined here} the number of unauthorized immigrants in the United States today hovers around 11.2 million. And, the number of unauthorized entering the country on an annual basis ranges between 300,000 and 500,000 men, women, and children.

Because of this, certain state and local governments, upset with the federal government’s perceived inability to meaningfully curtail the inflow of unauthorized immigrants to the United States despite exponentially increasing budgetary resources and policy mandates to do so, have decided to take matters into their own hands. Select states have passed restrictive immigration enforcement laws of their own in an effort to reign in unlawful immigration in the United States.  By using a phrase like “take matters into their own hands”,  the bishops give me the distinct impression that they disagree in principle with states supplementing the federal government in the enforcement of the nation’s laws regarding immigration.  I don’t understand the USCCB’s problem with states taking actions to supplement federal laws with their own (states do this already with drug enforcement).  In the matter of regulating border access and immigration, since the federal government has shown that they have no intention of enforcing its own laws, this seems entirely within the rights of the states wishing to do it.    Doesn’t this conform to the Catholic teaching of subsidiarity?  If a state government can enforce immigration laws better than the federal government what is so wrong with this?  Finally, is this situation of federal inaction really something that the bishops want to complain about under the label of an “Enforcement only” approach?  It looks, despite their rhetoric, like the problem they have with “enforcement only” is really their problem with the enforcement part of it, not with it being “only” enforcement.  They seem to have a problem with enforcement per se,  in spite of their nominal perfunctory statement of support for border enforcement (weak and unconvincing as it was).

While the majority of people crossing the border are doing so for economic means a former border agent named Zachary Taylor has stated that, “many of the people coming across the border are entering America illegally with the intention of doing real harm. They are coming with drugs, guns and inflicting violence, or are part of elaborate human smuggling networks with direct ties to the vast criminal cartels. The appeals to human compassion and “America is a nation of immigrants” meme ignores this very real and growing threat to the United States.”

Taylor made it clear that there is no level of violent depravity or government corruption outside the ability of the cartels. The Sinaloa, the Zetas, and others narco-insurgents are engaged in beheadings, mutilations, sexual assaults, as well as videotaped torture campaigns similar to what most people associate with Al Qaeda.

Then there is the issue of terrorism – terrorists coming across the border via Mexico.

Taylor said that Hezbollah is allying with the drug and alien smuggling operations at the border to help finance their operations in the Middle East.

Some may claim that the threat of terrorism is hyped or a remote possibility but for evidence to the contrary look to this video of “Muslim cleric Abdullah al-Nafisi talked about bringing 4 lbs of anthrax into the U.S., which he gleefully claimed would kill 330,000 people.”


The above information was posted in February of this year.  In May 2011 it was known that Hezballah was setting up operations in Mexico. Prior to this in 2010 it was known that members of the terrorist group Hezballah were crossing the border from Mexico into the United States.

Helping those who are less fortunate is a noble cause but we need to use prudence in how we aid those who need economic assistance.  Having a porous border and allowing immigrants to violate our laws and cross our borders without us having the opportunity to know who they really are is a dangerous and irresponsible prospect for this country.

The bishops have emphasized the teaching of the Church about the obligations of wealthy nations toward those seeking to immigrate to them, but they seem to pass over certain other related aspects of the doctrine of the Church without giving them the emphasis that they are due.  Here is the relevant passage of the Catechism:

2241 The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.

Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants’ duties toward their country of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.



Read Full Post »

My position on immigration has evolved over the past couple of months. I continue to believe that it isn’t right for individuals or families to cross the border into America via the back door instead using legal means. Our current legal immigration system is unjust and broken, and needs to be changed. Even though the law needs to be changed that doesn’t justify immigrants breaking the rule of law.

I agree with Newt Gingrich on immigration. We shouldn’t kick out immigrant families who have been in this country for around 18-25 years and have raised families here. Newt has also stated that a family must sponsor them in order for them to be able to become legal citizens. This is a good idea because this will show that the family has assimilated into our society and has some connection with the larger community. But, should they get off scott free without assuming any penalties for crossing the border illegally? No. I think each family should have to pay a fine. Each nuclear family could pay a fine of $400 per year multiplied by the number of years they have been in the country illegally. Immigrants can have a payment plan, much like we do with college loans. In addition if immigrants have been fraudulently using another’s Social Security number that would be a federal crime if a U.S. citizen had stolen and fraudulently used another person’s SS number so at the very least the offending immigrant should have to pay a substantial fine. Community service could be used in concert with a fine. I think a fine of $3500 and 200 hours of community service would be an appropriate punishment for the crime.

Now I will focus on the illegal immigrants who have been here for 17 years or less.

In addition immigrants must be willing to assimilate into American society. While these immigrants are our brothers and sisters in Christ and I feel compassion for their plight they must learn that to maintain an ordered society each person must follow the Sovereign’s laws. I have come up with a position of compromise on the immigration issue. Those immigrants who are 13 years and up should be required to be able to speak English at a 6th grade level. Adults must seek employment or be employed, serving in the military or have already served in the military to be considered for citizenship. Their place of employment or a military official could sponsor them so they are able to receive a green card. They should be granted a green card until citizenship is approved.

If immigrants do not have a sixth grade proficiency in English then they will have three years to learn the language. If they don’t, there will be consequences, such as being deported. Families would have to pay the same fine as I mentioned above. Individuals without families would have to pay $200 per year for every year they have been living in the U.S. illegally. These immigrants would be given anywhere between 3-5 years to pay the fine depending on how much the fine added up to. If the individual or families don’t pay their fines they should have to face consequences for refusing to comply with the citizenship process. We need to weed out those who don’t want to assimilate but be in gangs, those who are criminals, or those who want to conquer parts of America for Mexico from those who do want to assimilate and be contributing members in our society. The people who are unwilling to assimilate and those who are committing crimes should be deported.

We need immigration legislation that is multi-faceted. Under President Reagan the American people were promised by a democratically controlled Congress that if Reagan granted amnesty to illegal immigrants then the border would be secured. Well, has that happened yet? The first order of business in the legislation would be to make sure that the borders are secured before any type of amnesty takes place. We already tried it the other way around and promises weren’t fulfilled that should have been. We wouldn’t have the problem of how to deal with the influx of illegal immigrants if Congress had kept their promise and closed the borders. In addition, the legislation would start up a guest worker program like we had in the past. More government employees would be hired to speed up the citizenship process and the number of legal immigrants granted citizenship per year would be increased.

Read Full Post »

It would be nice if our government was as serious about enforcing our immigration laws at our southern border as they are about enforcing immigration laws against Israelis.

Read Full Post »

The Clean Times

News, thoughts and personal theories about fitness, diet, brain health, addiction and recovery

Natural News Tracker

Destroy the Myths and Reveal the Truth for Health Enthusiasts!

Howington Family

A shared blog by family members

For Christ's Crown & Covenant!

Explicitly Christian Commentary by Angela Wittman



Cmblake6's Weblog

Things will arise. I will comment.

Pastor Joe Quatrone, Jr.

Proclaiming relevant Bible truth and building up the Body of Christ!

Living the Reality of Jesus

How many of us actually do?

The Rio Norte Line

Est. 2010 - "Dishonest, diversionary and pompous..."


A site devoted to the Young Adult sci-fi/fantasy novel The Eye-Dancers

Cry and Howl

Cease, my son, to hear the instruction that causeth to err from the words of knowledge. Proverbs 19:27

Public Secrets

Purveyors of fine twisted propaganda since 2006!

Conservative Voice Of The People

******Site is currently being developed for new look - Should be updated by Mon - To see my latest go to an article and follow my twitter feed****

tomfernandez28's Blog

A topnotch WordPress.com site

American Glob

Updated Nightly

Inspirational Christian Blogs

Join us for inspiring words from today's best Christian authors

All-American Girl for the Restoration of Values

Not reinventing the conservative message. Just making it spicier.



Come, Follow Me...

The Lord's Calling...Are You listening?

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

I've dedicated this page to helping wake up America. You'll find lots of topics here of interest to American Patriots who wish to defend the Constitution completely and want to see America thrive the right way. We're bitter clingers who support limited government, support our military and veterans, don't mind waving Old Glory, and telling you we love the USA. Are you with us?

The Conservative Patriot

Conservative view points from the host of the Marty O Radio Show

Kindness Blog

Kindness Changes Everything...

Don Charisma

because anything is possible with Charisma

Men and Women Health

Life begins at 40's. Sex Life at 40's begins with Potensan. With Potensan; sex is not just an act, its an expeirence.

Facebook Apostles

Catholic & Apostolic Formation in the Digital Age

Inside Movies

Breaking Movie News and Scoops | Movie Reviews


And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb...

D.E. Cantor

Writer, Screenwriter, Journalist, with an Interest in Adoption

Dead Republican Party (DeRP)

The Dead Know Better...

The Abuse Expose' with Secret Angel

A blog reaching out to victims of abuse and others in need, providing insight about abuse, hope for the future, and guidance to see THE LIGHT that lead Secret Angel out of the darkness of her own abusive situation and helped her to not only survive but to overcome.

Noelle Campbell

Let me tell you a story...

T.B Rickert's Call

Looking at the world, it's all political


The website where movies count

MidnightWatcher's Blogspot

1 Thess 5:6, "Therefore let us not sleep, as others do, but let us watch ..."




How many are the Infidels, Heretics and Schismatic who do not enjoy the Happiness of the True Faith! The Earth is Full of them and they are All Lost! St. Alphonsus Maria De Liguori - EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

Our Life On The Border

Our life and ministry on the U.S. Mexican border

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

Taking Back America

...one post at a time


musing about music and its Creator


Ramblings of a Fellow Sojourner

God's Hidden Nuggets for the Endtimes

Revealing Truths from the Word of God


Inspirational poetry about faith, grace and redemption

New Life

Chris Jordan's Personal Blog

Jesus Carries Me

Christian blog covering mostly the character of Jesus and what we can learn from His perfect example


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 524 other followers