Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘health care’

First came the horrid Supreme Court decision on the Arizona law at the beginning of this week and now heaven help us with the latest horrendous Supreme Court decision on Obamacare.  Most of Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration law was struck down and Obamacare in its totality was upheld by the Supreme Court.  Both decisions are catastrophic for the cause of liberty.

The ruling on the Arizona law SB1070 was a devastating blow to states’ rights.  Plus, the one part of the law which was upheld the Obama administration made it abundantly clear that they  are unwilling to follow the rule of law and work with Arizona.  Basically the Obama administration and the Supreme Court let Arizona know that the state is on its own.  They are saying to Arizona: “You are not allowed to deal with the issue of illegal immigration even though there is a law on the books against coming to the USA the improper way and we are unwilling to enforce those laws since the more immigrants who cross the border the better it is for the Democrat Party.  To heck with the laws of the land.  We only will enforce the one’s we agree with.”

I haven’t read Justice Antonin Scalia’s entire dissenting opinion on the Arizona decision but the paragraphs that I have read are spot on.

From Yahoo:

The president said at a news conference that the new program is ‘the right thing to do’ in light of Congress’s failure to pass the administra­tion’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act,” Scalia, a Reagan appointee, wrote in his dissent. “Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforc­ing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.

Arizona bears the brunt of the country’s illegal immigration problem. Its citizens feel themselves under siege by large numbers of illegal immigrants who invade their property, strain their social services, and even place their lives in jeopardy. Federal officials have been unable to remedy the problem,and indeed have recently shown that they are unwilling to do so. Thousands of Arizona’s estimated 400,000 illegal immigrants—including not just children but men and women under 30—are now assured immunity from en­forcement, and will be able to compete openly with Ari­zona citizens for employment.

“Must Arizona’s ability to protect its borders yield to the reality that Congress has provided inadequate funding for federal enforcement—or, even worse, to the executive’s unwise targeting of that funding?” Scalia asked. Later, he added: “What I do fear—and what Arizona and the States that support it fear—is that ‘federal policies’ of nonen­forcement will leave the States helpless before those evil effects of illegal immigration.”

The federal government “does not want to enforce the immigration laws as written, and leaves the States’ borders unprotected against immigrants whom those laws would exclude.”

 

When I heard the news that the Supreme Court upheld Obamacare let’s just say I was in shock and couldn’t believe it at first.  Especially since they didn’t strike down the insurance mandate.  Then when I was told that the justices who voted to uphold Obamacare inserted their own arguments in order so the law would be considered constitutional I became furious.  They rejected Obama’s lawyer’s arguments and inserted their own so that the law would be considered constitutional.  Obama argued that the penalty wasn’t a tax.  But the Supreme Court justices who upheld Obamacare made the case for the Obama govt. that the fine is a really a tax.  Geesh.  That doesn’t make sense.  Is definitely absurd.

Is this another nail in liberty’s coffin?  With Justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas’s dissent in voting to strike down Obamacare they stood for liberty and followed the Constitution as our Founding Father’s instituted it in our nation.  The justices who upheld Obamacare did not follow the Constitution as it was envisioned by our Founding Fathers.  They are okay with interpreting the Constitution in their own way and remaking America into a different America which is less free with federal expansion and overreach into our lives.   Unfortunately the transformation of America into some socialists wet dream is taking place.  Sadly, that “shining city upon a hill whose beacon of light which guides freedom-loving people everywhere” as Ronald Reagan described the United States in his farewell address to the nation is dimming…. fading…. and quickly.   We have very little time to stop this nation from going further down the dark abyss of tyranny.  Both decisions, but especially the Obamacare decision, makes it an apparent necessity for citizens to vote out the big government freedom-hating Obama.  Libertarians, conservatives, independents, republicans, and democrats who love liberty must vote for Mitt Romney to stem the bleeding and start the recovery process to regain lost liberties.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

I found this great post over at Maggie’s Notebook that I thought I would share with you.  Obamacare is unsustainable, and this is one bit of proof.  Using big government and its bureaucracies is not the way to ensure that all Americans have access to health care and to lower the costs.   The answer lies within the private sector. Government health care only produces more rationing and the quality of care decreases for ALL CITIZENS. 

 

Two important issues here: Obama’s 2013 budget continues to bleed the agenda of how Government health care will impact your life, and it isn’t pretty. In just one year, costs have risen another $111 BILLION. The cost just soared another $111 BILLION, and the administration says there is no need for alarm. Second, a House subcommittee just passed legislation to repeal the ObamaCare Death Panels. It’s a small step, but one that needs to taken. See details below.

Just as Obama’s Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, didn’t know the DOD has spent $749,999.00 on a soccer field at Gitmo, Secretary of Health and Human Services is clueless as to why the Obama budget would reflect such an increase in ObamaCare. If you believe a word from these lying SOBs I have a beautiful waterfront lot in the Everglades – almost free for you.

Before getting into the $111 BILLION, the House Sub-Committee on Energy and Commerce passed with a semi-bipartisan vote, legislation to repeal the hand-picked board of 15 unelected bureaucrats (think BIG BUNDLER on their way to Ambassadorship – practically giddy they get to serve BO) that will decide whether you receive your knee replacement, or pacemaker, or whether the plug is to be pulled – otherwise known correctly as the Death Panel, but foisted on us as the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). Your doctor is nowhere in the equation of your health management.

Tuck this in your memory bank: IPAB’s actions are not subject to judicial review…

Heritage:

The bill to repeal this onerous part of the health law has 226 co-sponsors, 17 of whom are Democrats. Meanwhile, support for better ways to control Medicare’s cost using a premium support model continues to surface on both sides of the aisle. Premium support would allow seniors to use a defined government contribution to purchase the private plan that suits them best in a competitive marketplace. Patient empowerment and choice would drive better value for dollars spent, bringing down costs without jeopardizing quality or patient autonomy through government rationing.

The White House, on the other hand, continues to cling to its board of bureaucrats and has even proposed strengthening IPAB’s reach and expanding it powers. This week, White House official Nancy-Ann DeParle took to the White House blog to defend IPAB. According to DeParle, rationing won’t occur under the trusty IPAB, but it would in the consumer-driven conservative alternative. IPAB would put “you and your doctor” in charge, she writes, while premium support would put insurance companies in control. And above all, IPAB, according to DeParle, will bring down costs in Medicare, but premium support would do the opposite.

This is nonsense. Sure—IPAB could, in theory, control Medicare costs from the top-down—but not without devastating consequences to quality of patient care. The reason Americans are averse to government rationing is because it takes the power of decision-making out of the hands of doctors and patients and gives government bureaucrats stronger influence over care. IPAB is statutorily prohibited from “rationing,” but the statute includes no formal definition, and the board will still have to restrict access to providers, services, and/or treatments to hold down costs

GOP Research – the $111 BILLION hike:   CONTINUED 

Read Full Post »

Father Z of the blog What Does The Prayer Really Say? posted part of an interview that Hugh Hewitt had with Rick Santorum.  Santorum answers a question on President Obama’s attack on the Church.  Here is part of the transcript:

RS: I talked about it in every speech I’ve given today. And here’s what I said, though, Hugh. I said that I took issue with the Catholic Bishops Conference, because Hugh, you may remember, they embraced Obamacare.

HH: Yes.

RS: They embraced it and said…here’s what I said to them. Be careful when you have government saying that they can give you rights, that you have a right to health care, and government’s going to give you something, because once you are now dependant on government, they, not only can they take that right away, they can tell you how to exercise that right, and you can either like it or not. And that’s the problem. That’s what the Catholic Bishops Conference didn’t get, that there’s no free lunch here, folks. If you’re going to give people secular power, then they’re going to use it in a secular fashion. And that’s why, you know, I hate to say it, but you know, you had it coming. And it’s time to wake up and realize that government isn’t the answer to the social ills. It’s people of faith, and it’s families, and it’s communities, and it’s charities that need to do this as it has in America so successfully for so long.

HH: Rick Santorum, what do you advise Catholic hospitals, Catholic colleges, Catholic…the centers of poverty assistance, the adoption agencies? What do you advise them to do in the face of, as Archbishop Olmstead said, we cannot comply with this unjust law?

RS: Civil disobedience. This will not stand. There’s no way they can make this stand. The Supreme Court, eventually, this thing’s going to get to the Supreme Court just like the ministerial hiring issue that was just decided by the Supreme Court the other day. And it was a 9-0 decision that said the Obama administration can’t roll over people of faith when it comes to hiring. Yet in the face of that decision, this radical, secular government of Barack Obama continues to have faith be the least important of the 1st Amendment. And I just think they fight. They fight in the courts, and they fight by civil disobedience, and go to war with the federal government over this one.
[...]

The devil’s temptations at times can be quite enticing to the individual. Sometimes evil can be cloaked in goodness. I believe this is what happened to the Bishops with regards to Obamacare.
As noble as it is for the bishops to want to ensure that every person has acess to health care in the United States that is an impossible feat. Did the Bishops “dance with the devil” when they left the unborn for collateral damage in order to support Obamacare and the Democrat Party? I mean c’mon, when you have knowledge that Obama voted against the Infant Born Alive Infant Protection Act, that many in the Democrat Party believe in the “choice” to kill innocents via abortion, that these people have imposed numerous strangling regulations on the American people and have taken God out of our public schools thus removing the teaching of morality how can you honestly be surprised that the Obama admin would force their secularist values ( or lack thereof) down our throat? In the past big government has not been friendly but in fact hostile to religion and liberty so why would the bishops think that getting in bed with big government policies in the U.S. would turnout any differently? It is my opinion that the Church and in particular our bishops have been snake-bitten by the serpent.  Now, we need to pray for our bishops and the Church.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 500 other followers