Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Constitution’ Category

The trustees have chosen a new president to succeed Fr. Terence Henry at Franciscan University of Steubenville.  His name is Father Sean Sheridan.  He has a strong legal background which will help in the fight against the unjust HHS mandate which does not respect conscience rights or citizens’ religious liberty.

“I am honored to serve as the next president of Franciscan University,” Father Sheridan said in a statement. “It is inspiring and truly humbling for me to be here at Franciscan University with the students who are pouring their hearts into their education and their prayer life, falling in love with God and the Church and striving to become saints.”

Here is a little bit about Father Sheridan’s credentials:

Father Sheridan entered the Franciscan Third Order Regular in 2000, leaving behind a career as an attorney focused on health-care litigation. He made his solemn profession of vows in 2005 and was ordained to the priesthood the following year. Father Sheridan continued his legal education in the Church, earning a doctorate in canon law from Catholic University of America in 2009. He wrote his dissertation addressing seven challenges — and potential solutions — to implementing Ex Corde Ecclesiae (From the Heart of the Church), Pope John Paul II’s 1992 apostolic constitution for Catholic higher education.

Father Sheridan served as an assistant professor of canon law at CUA from 2009 until last fall, when he became a professor in Franciscan University’s theology department.

“He’s got the right mix of academic, pastoral and professional experience,” Hernon said. “He’s got the mission of the university in his heart, and he wears it on his sleeve. We know he’s going to continue to see how the university can respond to the call St. Francis received from Christ, to ‘Go, rebuild my Church.’”

We have a story of authentic courage of someone who has stuck by their beliefs even among pressure in these ever changing times of what our culture deems as acceptable.  Chris Broussard is the ESPN analyst who was asked to comment on on the NBA basketball player Jason Collins who announced that he is gay for all the world to hear.  Broussard said that homosexuality is a sin. He went onto say:

“If you’re openly living in unrepentant sin, whatever that may be,” including heterosexual sex outside of marriage, you are “walking in open rebellion to God and to Jesus Christ.”

Instead of being respectful and tolerant of his point of view some people have taken to twitter to call for ESPN to fire Chris Broussard.

It looks like the Southern Poverty Law Center has some explaining to do.  It appears that the SPLC influenced a domestic terrorist attack by labeling the Family Research Council as a “hate” group.  Seeing this information on the SPLC’s website spurred Floyd Lee Corkins to shoot at innocent workers at the Washington-based Family Research Center. Corkins has pleaded guilty to a charge of domestic terrorism and will be charged in June. Lives were spared as a result of the heroic actions of Leonardo Johnson, the security guard/building manager. 

Apparently religious freedom for Christians in the military will not be tolerated.  Here our military men and women are fighting to protect our freedoms which are outlined in the Constitution and yet their rights won’t be protected while serving.  Geesh! This is disgraceful. Totally unconscionable!  

From ChristianPost: 

President Obama’s new “religious tolerance” consultant to the Pentagon, Mikey Weinstein, wants Christian military service members who openly talk about their faith in uniform to be charged with treason, which is a crime punishable by death according to military law.

By employing his consulting services, and as Commander-in-Chief, President Obama is effectively endorsing Weinstein’s recently voiced and written views such as: “Today, we face incredibly well-funded gangs of fundamentalist Christian monsters who terrorize their fellow Americans by forcing their weaponized [sic] and twisted version of Christianity upon their helpless subordinates in our nation’s armed forces.”

President Obama is someone who claims that he is a Christian.  If he is a Christian why would he employ a “religious tolerant” consultant that calls Christians “monsters who terrorize their fellow Americans”?  By “fundamentalist” does Weinstein mean, actually follows the Bible and adheres to timeless biblical truths?  So I guess he thinks modernism and moral relativism “true Christianity”?  This administration has been the most hostile to Christians (traditional Christians) in recent modern history.  This is not only intolerance but is persecutory in nature. And some people wonder why we a number of say that Obama is shredding the Constitution. It is obvious that he has no respect for the Constitution or citizens’ rights.  He acts as if he were king.  I do pray for his conversion of heart and soul.  

Israeli President Shimon Perez has invited Pope Francis to visit Israel.  Pope Francis has accepted the invitation “with willingness and joy” .  No date has been set for the visit. 

A Vatican statement said they discussed prospects for a resumption of negotiations for a solution that would respect “the legitimate aspirations of the two Peoples, thus decisively contributing to the peace and stability of the region.”

Read Full Post »

links_image1

Apparently there has been some hullabaloo about news sites claiming that Pope Francis as Cardinal Bergoglio endorsed civil unions back in 2010. That’s a bunch of hooey. According to one of the Pope’s confidants Francis was faced with gay “marriage” being thrust upon citizens in Argentina so he offered the lesser of two evils as to have further discussion on the matter. It is the same when voting for a piece of legislation. Canon law allows for the politician voting for the legislation that is the lesser of two evils when there is no good option.

Woites’s statements contradict a New York Times article published yesterday stating, “Faced with the near certain passage of the gay marriage bill, Cardinal Bergoglio offered the civil union compromise as the ‘lesser of two evils,’ said Sergio Rubin, his authorized biographer. ‘He wagered on a position of greater dialogue with society.’”

Here is the article http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bergoglio-didnt-suggest-endorsing-homosexual-civil-unions-in-2010-says-conf

Fr. Orsi at Ave Maria is taking bishops to task for being unwilling to refuse Holy Communion to politicians who are in grave sin those who support abortion and euthanasia.  I’d add being in support of same-sex marriage to the list. Both Biden and Pelosi received Communion at Pope Francis’ installation mass. These type of politicians have been obstinate for so long and the bishops’ pastoral approach hasn’t worked over a lengthy period of time that a more visible act of standing for the faith and against scandal is necessary.  Here is a bit of what Fr. Orsi has to say:

Politicians such as Biden and Pelosi have been stubborn and contumacious in their pro-abortion policies and in presenting themselves for reception of the Eucharist. They know that the American bishops, for the most part, prefer a “pastoral approach,” which means basically let’s talk to them and help them to see the error of their ways. It has not worked, and there is no indication that it will. The topic of this essay is proof enough! They also know that Catholic priests are instructed not to cause a scene on the Communion line and that the person be permitted to receive. Thus, they opt to take advantage of these charitable loopholes.

There is a solution and perhaps some hope for stronger enforcement of Church policy on offending pols. The Vatican should clearly state that politicians who promote a culture of death, abortion, and euthanasia, are subject to excommunication by their bishop. Pope-Emeritus  Benedict XVI  made an unofficial statement on a trip to Mexico, in 2007, stating  that excommunication for pro choice legislators was not arbitrary and is part of canon law.  This would strengthen Canon 915 and some bishops’ backbones.

It is well known that Pope Francis forbade pro- choice politicians from receiving Holy Communion in his diocese, in Argentina.  Perhaps the new Pope can move this project along?

By the bishops refusing to take strong action, such as excommunication, politicians will continue their “in your face” attitude toward the church and her leaders. Such a failure will also continue to allow Catholics and people of good will to be scandalized. Even worse, it gives the impression that others may follow the behavior of wayward  politicians with impunity.

Biden and Pelosi only did at the Vatican what they have been allowed to do at home.  As the great Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonheoffer stated so well, dear bishops;  Not to act is to act!

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ave-maria-law-priest-takes-bishops-to-task-for-failing-to-deny-communion-to?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=80c9604d99-LifeSiteNews_com_US_Headlines_03_20_2013&utm_medium=email

Dang those sequester cuts. Bang. Bop. That hurts… Wait!!! Hold on… stop listening to the MSM meme. Were there really cuts to government agencies because of the sequester? To Find out you can visit The Sequester Lies: Where are the Republicans? at Conservative Hideout. It’s all laid out neatly in a graph.

The Conservative Lady has a post titled A New “Most Dangerous” Man in America?   This person is a mayor of a major city but he has much influence over national politics.  He is a radical who wants to change (er take away) your rights using force.  He is not only against illegal guns but is also against legal guns.

1CatholicSalmon has a good post called Palm Sunday – the day after tomorrow, and Holy Week begins. Doesn’t it seem like Lent has flown by? Hard to believe it’s already almost one day before Holy Week begins.

Biltrix has a great post called Father, Forgive Them!  Fr. Jason Smith explains about having the urge to throw away his anger toward Judas betrayal when he hears the words ”Father forgive them.”  This had me questioning, should we really be angry at Judas? Wasn’t he apart of God’s divine plan? An essential part? Without Judas would Jesus have died to save our sins? Possibly…. but since this is what happened in God’s divine plan to save all of humanity from sin wouldn’t giving thanks to Judas be more appropriate?  We all sin and whether the sin be big or small if we ask for forgiveness God will grant His mercy and forgive us. For this reason and with there being conflicting accounts of Judas’ death  I do believe that it is possible that Judas repented before his death. This would mean that Judas would have been forgiven by God just as the rest of us are forgiven when we repent in Reconciliation.

 

Read Full Post »

I am so proud of Sen. Rand Paul for standing on principle. In representing the American people he wanted to know whether or not this administration claimed to authorize drone strikes on American soil against the American people, whether they have the right to shoot citizens on American soil. He needed President Obama and/or Eric Holder to clarify but they refused so he filibustered. This was in the context of John Brennan’s nomination so he was filibustering Brennan’s nomination for CIA director. Go Rand Paul!!! I am so happy that my senator from Pa supported Rand Paul. As the hours of Rand Paul’s filibustering continued to pass more senators supported him. Eric Holder finally caved in and gave an answer.  The White House finally responded with saying NO, they don’t have the authority to authorize drone strikes on American soil.

 

Here are some fantastic posts from some awesome patriots:

Lindsay Graham’s Principled vote for Brennan – Would Have Voted Against Him But Rand Paul’s Filibuster Made Him Vote For 

So, These Two Republican Senators Walk Into An Elevator… #StandWithRand 

Senator Rand Paul – Asking Questions No One Wants To Answer 

Vote Tally Count John Brennan for CIA Director

Rand Paul: Standing on Principle! 

From maverick to rump swap: John McCain calls Rand Paul a “wacko bird” 

Newt Gingrich: John McCain’s Criticism of Rand Paul is ‘Sad’ 

 

Here’s some rock n’ roll for your enjoyment from Motor City Times — AC/DC: High Voltage (1975) 

 

 

Read Full Post »

Rand Paul is prepared to stop President Obama’s gun control plans. He says his gun control plans, especially the ones Obama thinks he can do via executive order, must be stopped.  Rand Paul has come up with legislation - Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act - which would nullify Obama’s executive orders on gun control and preserve the 2nd Amendment.

From Reason.com: 

Paul says his legislation will declare that “Any executive order by President Obama infringing on the Second Amendment rights of all Americans would be declared null and void” and “would prohibit federal funds to implement President Obama’s executive orders impacting the 2nd Amendment.”

 

Talking Points Memo has a more detailed outline of Sen. Rand Paul’s legislation.

 

President Obama has absolutely no authority under the Constitution to use his executive powers to pen an executive order which would infringe upon citizens 2nd Amendment rights.

Read Full Post »

Reblogged from Biltrix:

Click to visit the original post

Banned as Unconstitutional

For North Carolina residents looking to tout pro-life values on their state-granted license plates, disappointment abounds. U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox has ruled against plates that read “Choose Life” — unless the state government also creates a similar design for individuals who support abortion rights. -- The Blaze

Read more… 289 more words

This is a violation of North Carolinians free speech. I wonder if this would have happened if this was a license plate created by the pro-abortion (pro-choice) crowd? Would the judge have deemed it unconstitutional based on the lack of having a license plate showcasing the other side? Somehow I doubt it. This judge misinterpreted the First Amendment and squelched an opposing point of view. His reasoning for declaring the choose life plate unconstitutional is nonsensical. Tyranny meets the U.S. This judge needs our prayers.

Read Full Post »

In Deacon Keith Fournier’s article We Do Not Need Conservatism We Need A Classical Christian Revival he makes the case that citizens in America need to return to Godly principles, makes the case for a classical christian revival.  But Deacon Keith also claims that we don’t need conservatism. I agree that we need a classical christian revival but I disagree with him when he states we don’t need conservatism. I believe that many conservative principles go hand-in-hand with traditional christian principles so I don’t think that we should outright dismiss principles of conservatism.  Conservatives believe in the constitution – adhering to the constitution – and the constitution recognizes that as individuals we are granted certain rights by our Creator so this goes along with classical Christian beliefs. Let’s promote both classical christian and conservative principles.

Here is the article by Deacon Keith Fournier:

I am afraid we will be fooled again if, after this election, we buy the idea that conservatism is the solution to what is needed in this Nation – and in the West. The collapse of Western civilization will not be remedied by conservatism. Political movements alone are inadequate for the task.

WASHINGTON,DC (Catholic Online) – In the aftermath of the US Presidential election the Monday morning quarterbacks are out in full force. I write to address a deeper  concern. We must be wary of any attempt to equate a political label with being a Christian – including the label conservative.

Make no mistake, I am not a political liberal. Nor am I what is masquerading as a political progressive these days. I have long contended that there is nothing progressive about contemporary political progressives.

The judicial manufacture of a right to reach into wombs and kill our youngest neighbors is not progressive. Judicial and legislative efforts to give practicing homosexual paramours equal legal status to marriage is not progressive.

Denying the Right to the Free Exercise of Religion, the “First Freedom” in the American tradition, is not progressive. It is a threat to the very foundation of all of our freedoms.

Catholic Christians know that the Gospel of Jesus Christ demands a response which goes beyond the walls of our Church buildings. We are our brother and sister’s keeper. We do not reach out to people in need because they are Catholic, we reach out to people in need because we are Catholic.

No HHS regulation will compel us to violate our deeply held religious beliefs. Neither can a Presidential administration compel us to stop caring for the poor, the sick and the needy. Clearly, the next few months are leading to an historic Church/State showdown in the United States of America.

At a level much deeper than political labels, we are experiencing a clash of worldviews and competing definitions of human freedom, human flourishing, human progress and what constitutes a truly just and human social order. The positions espoused – and lifestyles affirmed – as progressive by some using the term as a political label turn the clock back on progress.

I will soon be 58 years old. In some ways I am still just an aging “former hippie” whose rejection of the misguided values of a consumerist, secularist, narcissistic, hedonist, instrumentalist and nihilist culture led me to re-embrace the Catholic Christian faith as the true alternative culture when I was a much younger man.

Recently, while in line at Starbucks for coffee, I heard a young couple comment on a CD offered for sale on the counter rack. It featured the best hits of the rock group “The Who”, taken from their long musical career.  The cover was a photo of the Who I remembered from when I first began listening to them.

The young man said to his girlfriend, “can you believe that is the Who. I can’t believe they looked like that.” I smiled and chimed in, “That’s them, I remember it well”. We all smiled.  However, as I left with my coffee I recalled the words from one of their songs which haunts me these days, “We don´t get Fooled Again.”

Continued 

Read Full Post »

Do you think that citizens should be required to pass a test on constitutional competency and on  general political and current events knowledge before being allowed to vote?

On the one hand it is obvious that a good portion of the electorate does not have the adequate understanding of our constitution so that they can be properly informed to vote with the necessary informed consent.  On the other hand there are those who want to subvert the constitution, misunderstand what the document says (they may have been taught to believe this way or come to this belief on their own),  and want to make the constitution a living document which doesn’t comport with our founders vision for America.  Would a constitutional competency test in combination with a general political knowledge and current events test would help to reduce apathy in America? Would this help to stop our constitution from becoming a “living” document?

If you have ever watched man on the street with Jay Leno you may have noticed the incompetence of a number of people who Leno has interviewed.  How can you forget who the current vice president is?

I believe the first of these tests should be taken in the junior year in high school.  After the initial one, future required tests could be attached to the census which is administered once per decade.

The act of voting comes with responsibility.  As Americans we are called to understand, properly interpret, believe in the principles that our Founders espoused, and to protect and defend the constitution fervently.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Here are two videos showing election fraud at the Organizing For America Headquarters.

 

 

 

Here the field director of Jim Moran’s(D-VA) campaign conspires to commit voter fraud, forge documents.

H/T Project Veritas

 

Voter fraud exists. And it isn’t a small problem or as small as Democrats would have you believe. Conservatives are not exaggerating about the amount of voter fraud occurring in the U.S. It is pervasive across this country. To ensure fair elections voter fraud needs to be stopped.  Voter I.D. bills need to be enacted and existing voter I.D. laws need to be enforced.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 501 other followers