Sister Margaret A. Farley R.S.M’s book: “Just Love. A Framework for Christian Sexual Ethics,” stated that homosexual acts, masturbation, and divorce can be morally acceptable. Now the Vatican has corrected this wayward nun, reaffirming the sinfulness of homosexual acts, masturbation, and divorce. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith asserts that her book contradicts Catholic doctrine. The Vatican had sent Sr. Farley notification of the doctrinal problems in her book but since she failed to clarify or fix the errors the CDF proceeded to publish the Notification in defense of the faith. The Pope gave his approval of Cardinal Levada’s corrections.
“The Vatican asserts that Sr. Farley’s book contains ‘erroneous propositions, the dissemination of which risks grave harm to the faithful’ and expresses deep regret that Sr. Farley ‘affirms positions that are in direct contradiction with Catholic teaching in the field of sexual morality.’”
Cardinal William Joseph Levada corrects Sr. Farley’s opinions:
In her book, Sr. Farley claims that homosexual relationships and activities “can be justified according to the same sexual ethic as heterosexual relationships and activities.” “This opinion is not acceptable,” declares the Vatican Notification.
In its Notification, the Vatican clarifies that while people with homosexual tendencies must be respected, in no way can homosexual acts or unions be approved. Homosexual acts, the Vatican reiterates, are “acts of grave depravity.”
The Vatican distinguishes between “persons with homosexual tendencies and homosexual acts.” While persons with homosexual tendencies must be treated with respect, compassion and sensitivity, and “every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided,” nevertheless homosexual acts are “intrinsically disordered.”
The CDF also condemned Sr. Farley’s views on homosexual unions. Sr. Farley urges that U.S. legislation should support “social recognition and legal standing to unions between lesbians and gays,” making such unions equal to heterosexual unions. “This position,” states the Notification, “is opposed to the teaching of the Magisterium.”
On masturbation, Sr. Farley had written that it “usually does not raise any moral questions at all,” and maintains that it is not a moral issue, and can actually benefit relationships.
The Vatican refutes this, explaining: “The deliberate use of the sexual faculty, for whatever reason, outside of marriage is essentially contrary to its purpose. For here sexual pleasure is sought outside of the sexual relationship which is demanded by the moral order and in which the total meaning of mutual self-giving and human procreation in the context of true love is achieved.” Contrary to Farley’s assertions, the Vatican says masturbation is, “an intrinsically and gravely disordered action.”
Sr. Farley also maintains that divorce is sometimes acceptable, stating that marriages may be “subject to release” especially in situations “in which too much has changed” in the relationship.
“This opinion,” states the CDF Notification, “is in contradiction to Catholic teaching on the indissolubility of marriage.” The Vatican declares that not only is divorce illicit, but also in cases of marriage after divorce, “the new union cannot be recognized as valid.”
Kudos to the Vatican for correcting this wayward nun in such a public manner in defense of the faith.



I second the “Kudos.” You know Teresa I just do not get it and it truly puzzles me??? If you do not want to be Catholic and following Church teachings, then why be ONE?? Why cause all of this mess that takes the time of others to correct?? Of all things why become a “religious?” Some people get on my ever lovin’ nerves, and this nun does! Thanks for post and God Bless, SR
Reblogged this on catholicboyrichard and commented:
THIS reblog and the one just below are interrelated in many ways. Please read them both, as they are excellent and must once and for all clear up some key issues. The Vatican is not being “mean” here–they are giving her a chance to repent and renounce her idiocy. I pray she does.
I agree with SR above. I don’t understand why someone would take the vows of a religious order if she can’t espouse the precepts of the church.
Well stated, Teresa. I thank God that the Church is taking corrective measures. Perhaps, Sr. Pat will ultimately accept the correction and amend her position. Hopefully she will recognize her errors and realize that the Chuch is God’s instrument of truth and light.